To comment scroll to the bottom of the entry. Your e-mail address and URL are optional fields.


2006 07 06
Building the ROM Crystal - Status 27
image
Libeskind's ROM Crystal continues its stately progression. Today's image - they are all taken from a web cam on the top of an adjacent hotel - made me think of the Slow Food movement. Why? In a culture that has come to equate speed and efficiency as an integral part of modern life, the idea that we build architectural icons like the Crystal in defiance of that accepted norm says something about our culture. Maybe it's because I'm reading The Omnivore's Dilemma. That book discusses how what we decide to eat can change the world. Similarly, what we decide to build as a symbol of who we are as a culture might change the world.

The ROM's decision to build Libeskind's vision was a courageous one. I've vacillated between thinking the choice was driven by a somewhat cynical view of spectacle-driven culture or a genuine comprehension that a museum is the ideal platform to investigate the integration of advanced technological means with a profound philosophical grasp of the 21st Century human condition. The resulting complexity when deftly managed can be inspirational. When the first phase of the renovation opened last December I was surprised at Libeskind's ability to remake and energize the historic ROM galleries. They are masterfully done. That gave me faith that the renovation was more than skin deep.

In a world where, for example, papers have to dumb themselves down to sustain readership, the ROM's choice to embrace complexity should console us. Why? I think that in spite of media's tendency to drive discourse down to the lowest common denominator, people remain hungry for the authenticity and pleasure of original ideas. Today's image of the Crystal with its combination of complex geometry and lattice-like substructure reflects that hunger in an abstract way.

[email this story] Posted by R Ouellette on 07/06 at 08:29 AM
  1. I like Likeskind’s ROM crystal for the same reason I like pure spectacle: it evokes wonder and delight. I have loved the structure ever since the giant steel beams began jutting out of the building like a fractal explosion. Indeed, I have been a little sorry to see those beams cloaked and tamed by the crystal’s skin.

    This kind of spectacle is quite different from the one the Situationists bemoaned, nor can it be confused with the commodity fetishism that a suburban movie-plex might, for example, be considered to represent. The crystal isn’t a simulation or a representation in any reduced sense (I part ways with both Baurillard and Borges in this matter on other grounds, too). Like good and meaningful art, it elevates our gaze by enlarging the factical. Instead of drugging or dulling our senses, it becomes an object of focus, discussion, argument. It makes us feel and think at the same time, and these days that is something of an accomplishment.

    I love the way the crystal thrusts out of the building, its angles shearing against the regular geometry of the structure they emerge from. It gives the impression of defying gravity, and manages to be both massive and translucent at once. It is architecture at the moment of chrysalis. And like quartz or (more particularly) halite crystals, the structure is itself inorganic but essential to life.

    Posted by Amy Lavender Harris  on  07/06  at  09:56 AM

<< Back to main



Toronto News
MESH Cities
Spacing
Blogto.com
CBC Toronto
Torontoist.com
Toronto Galleries



Related Links
Toronto Stories by
Stats
Toronto Links
Your Opinions


Other Blogs
News Sources
Syndicate